Hello
It is said that asyn can be used for synchronous devices.
I am contemplating using asyn for my video acquisition driver.
Is that a good idea? As anybody done this?
The design could be as follow:
If I use a PCI frame grabber I instantiate the PCI interface.
If I use a streaming server (AXIS), I instantiate the axis network
interface.
If I want a set of test images, I instantiate a dummy interface, etc.
The upper asyn layer does all the image processing (such as profile
calculation, etc). The interface is actually the "hardware driver" and
its purpose is only the acquisition of a snapshot (in a specific format)
and the generation of software interrupts.
Is this a good design for asyn sync drivers?
Should the profile calculation be part of the interface and the
interrupt be generated when all the processing has been completed?
How can I justify using the asyn driver for sync devices over other
methods? what are the benefits of using asyn here?
--
Emmanuel
- Replies:
- RE: asyn for synchronous devices Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: RT linux John Sinclair
- Next:
RE: asyn for synchronous devices Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: graphical operator interface based on JAVA Elder Matias
- Next:
RE: asyn for synchronous devices Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|