EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: channelwatcher vs BURT
From: Ralph Lange <[email protected]>
To: Heinrich du Toit <[email protected]>
Cc: EPICS Tech Talk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:58:24 +0200
Hello Heinrich,

You are correct:

BURT is about saving and restoring snapshots. You have pre-configured lists of channels, and the operator decides at a certain moment to take a snapshot of the listed channels' values. This snapshot is saved as (a set of) file(s), and can be restored to the channels at a later time.

AutoSaveRestore is about having channels keep their values during a reboot. You have similar pre-configured lists of channels, but the values are continuously saved to file, and the IOC loads the most recent values back during startup.

ChannelWatcher only replaces the "save" part of that system: the original AutoSaveRestore writes the data directly from the IOC to a file, while the ChannelWatcher is a daemon on a remote system, that collects the data through channel access to write it locally to file.

There are GUI interfaces to BURT: Thomas Birke wrote one (TCL/TK) that we use at BESSY ([email protected]), Steve Singleton recently wrote a new GUI with similar features (python), which is in use at Diamond. (He was giving a talk at the last EPICS meeting, you will find his slides on the meeting page.)

Hope this helps,
Ralph


Heinrich du Toit wrote:
Hi

Am I correct in saying that channel watcher and BURT does not do exactly
the same thing?

channel watcher will make sure PVs keep values between IOC reboots
(crashes/powertrips)

while BURT can be used if we have multiple/different setups for PVs
inside IOCs.

So actually both is needed?

Is there some kind of GUI interface to manage BURT?
So that operators can easily switch between different configs?

-Heinrich



Replies:
RE: channelwatcher vs BURT Mark Rivers
References:
channelwatcher vs BURT Heinrich du Toit

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: startup script Ralph Lange
Next: RE: CAC-TCP-recv suspended Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: channelwatcher vs BURT Heinrich du Toit
Next: RE: channelwatcher vs BURT Mark Rivers
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Nov 2011 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·