Folks,
I have a question about the mbboDirect record, specifically the
interaction of the .VAL and .B0-.BF fields.
On the mbbiDirect record the .VAL fields and .BO-.BF fields are
always consistent.
However, this does not seem to be the case with the mbboDirect record.
If I write to the .Bn fields of the mbboDirect record, the .VAL field
updates as expected. However, the opposite is not true. If I write to
.VAL field, the .Bn fields do not change. This does not make sense to
me.
Can someone explain why this is so, or is it a bug?
Thanks,
Mark
- Replies:
- Re: Question about mbboDirect record Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Maximum archival rate Lawrence T. Hoff
- Next:
RE: WireSet & mpc8540 Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: WireSet & mpc8540 Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: Question about mbboDirect record Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|