Kate Feng wrote:
> Kate Feng wrote:
>
> > Andrew Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The PCIbus Retry and Disconnect cycle terminations that you discussed do
> > > not actually stop the data transfer cycle completely, they only permit
> > > it to be run again or to take longer to complete than a regular PCIbus
> > > single I/O cycle.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, that's why the overhead is only needed for ISR and where interrupt is
> > disabled.
>
> I do'nt have the mvme6100 system setup for tests. However, this is somthing
> that could be verified via some tests.
I really meant that I can not be responsible for statement that I did'nt
have tests on. Andrew's "sure-fire way" could be right.
Regards,
Kate
- References:
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Andrew Johnson
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Andrew Johnson
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Failure to build EPICS 3.14.8.2 on Windows XP using VC++ 2005 Express Edition Alan Greer
- Next:
RE: Failure to build EPICS 3.14.8.2 on Windows XP using VC++ 2005Express Edition Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Kate Feng
- Next:
Re: VME Bus Error handling on MVME3100 and MVME6100 boards Till Straumann
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|