Eric Bjorklund wrote:
2. Would it be reasonable for the vxWorks hook (atReboot.cpp) to
register with rebootHookAdd if it did not find sysAtReboot in the symbol
table? (at least then I could get my cards disabled -- and I don't
really care about the order).
Are you reluctant or unable to add the sysAtReboot mechanism to your
BSPs? The message describing the required change is at
http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2005/msg00004.php
- Andrew
--
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest
bears and the dumbest tourists -- Yosemite National Park Ranger
- Replies:
- Re: OSI Replacement for rebootHookAdd ??? Eric Bjorklund
- References:
- OSI Replacement for rebootHookAdd ??? Eric Bjorklund
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Knob Controls Robert Emery
- Next:
Re: OSI Replacement for rebootHookAdd ??? Eric Bjorklund
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: OSI Replacement for rebootHookAdd ??? Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: OSI Replacement for rebootHookAdd ??? Eric Bjorklund
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|