>>> On 1/30/2006 at 14:18:01 CST, Mark Rivers wrote:
> But there is only one copy of the code for calcout in the entire IOC,
> right? calcoutRecord.o is only 12kB on a vxWorks-ppc604, so it does not
> seem very inefficient to me.
D'oh! You're correct, of course.
> The size of struct(calcoutRecord) is a little bigger than
> struct(aoRecord), but not by a large amount.
Actually, it's more than 50% bigger (at least for an mv167), but I'll agree
that's not significant unless you have a very large number of them.
----
Brian McAllister Senior Software Engineer
[email protected] Bates Research & Engineering Center
(617) 253-9537 Middleton, MA
- References:
- RE: enhanced seq record Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: enhanced seq record Mark Rivers
- Next:
mallocMustSucceed( 0 ) non-portable Till Straumann
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: enhanced seq record Mark Rivers
- Next:
Ansi compiler switch Michael Abbott
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|