Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System
| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about length of PV names |
| From: | Marty Kraimer <[email protected]> |
| To: | Mark Rivers <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | Gavin Smith <[email protected]>, [email protected] |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:12:26 -0600 |
Mark Rivers wrote:
The 60 character limit in 3.14 is the maximum length of a record name,
not a PV name, right? Is there a limit on the length of the PV name,
i.e. record name plus field name? Is there a limit on the length of the
field name?
Yes 60 is the record name length.
In 3.14 there is no limit on field names. However, some CA clients may break.
- References:
- RE: Question about length of PV names Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev: RE: Question about length of PV names Mark Rivers
- Next: compiler bug in gcc version 2.8.1 (Tornado1) for PPC corrupts floationg point constants? Dirk Zimoch
- Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev: RE: Question about length of PV names Mark Rivers
- Next: compiler bug in gcc version 2.8.1 (Tornado1) for PPC corrupts floationg point constants? Dirk Zimoch
- Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·