Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Oh you are right! I guess in the case of the calc record processing the
result would be assigned to a double wouldn't it?

Thanks for pointing that out.

The request for testers still stands, thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Singleton, SJ (Steve) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:11 AM
To: Thompson, David H.
Subject: RE: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6

Hello David,

Isn't there a mistake in the test you give below?  From my experience
the
fault only shows up if you assign the result of the comparison to a
double,
not to an int.   I therefore think the test should be:

double stack[]={0.0,1.0};
double * pStack=&stack[0];

double i=(*pStack==*(pStack+1));

Regards
Steve

Replies:

Re: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6 Lawrence T. Hoff

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6 Ronald L. Sluiter

Next: Re: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6 Lawrence T. Hoff

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <2004>  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: RE: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6 Thompson, David H.

Next: Re: calc and calcout records in EPICS 3.14.6 Lawrence T. Hoff

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <2004>  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024