Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Benjamin Franksen <[email protected]> · Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:36:49 +0200

On Saturday 28 August 2004 05:35, Wayne Dahl wrote:
> I spoke too soon, sorry to cast blame.  But I still have a problem.
>
> The source of genSubRecordSizeOffset has
>
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[42]->size=sizeof(prec->flnk);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[42]->offset=(short)((char *)&prec->flnk - (char
> *)prec);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[43]->size=sizeof(prec->vers);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[43]->offset=(short)((char *)&prec->vers - (char
> *)prec);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[44]->size=sizeof(prec->val);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[44]->offset=(short)((char *)&prec->val - (char
> *)prec);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[45]->size=sizeof(prec->oval);
>   pdbRecordType->papFldDes[45]->offset=(short)((char *)&prec->oval - (char
> *)prec);
>
> Note entry 43.  If I print out the items being looped over in
> dbLexReoutines.c:dbRecordtypeBody  I get
>
>
>  we are here 40
>  pdbFldDes name = UDF     // this is item 40
>  we are here 41
>  pdbFldDes name = TIME
>  we are here 42
>  pdbFldDes name = FLNK
>  we are here 43
>  pdbFldDes name = VAL
>  we are here 44
>  pdbFldDes name = OVAL
>
> Note that item 42 is FLNK but 43 is VAL, not VERS.  What happened to vers?

Just a thought: Could this be caused by an interference with the standard 
record *attribute* named VERS?

Ben

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System