EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS]
From: Brian Tieman <[email protected]>
To: Ned Arnold <[email protected]>
Cc: APS tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:26:18 -0600
Ned,

I've been using the Active-X implementation for a month or two now. It feels more like the Portable Server in that it's easy to create a PV and have it served without the complications of supporting a full record--which is a good thing! Since most of what I use LabView for is quick and dirty, I would be happy with this type of interface as opposed to full record support.

The biggest problem I have with this Active-X interface and LabView is that CA calls queue up. There's no support for anything like threads or even events. The created PV must be in a loop and checked periodically to see if a client requests a change. Also, once a change has been detected and the LabView process starts doing its thing, any subsequent client requests are ignored until the first request is completed. The client requests seem to be queued in some manner--which can be a real problem.

I'm not sure if these issues are inherent to LabView or just my limited experience with LabView development, but I have pulled out significant clumps of hair over these two issues.

Brian Tieman

Ned Arnold wrote:


I recently had a discussion with the Product Manager of LabView
Realtime/Embedded about possibly implementing a tightly-coupled EPICS
interface to LabView. They have heard alot about EPICS from their
customers and would like to investigate what would be involved in providing this capability in an integrated way.


The first question for us to answer is "what do we want?". So, I would
like to hear people's experience with the EPICS/LabView interfaces that
are currently available. I know of two major ones:

  - Active-X interfaces (for clients and server)
  - Shared-memory interface to standard EPICS records (3.14)

Please contribute your experiences, comments, ideas, wishes, etc with
these solutions or let us know of any others that have been done. For those of you familiar with LabView, what other capabilities/features/performance requirements would you like to see?


The goal would be to develop a list of requirements for the
"out-of-the-box" LabView/EPICS solution.

Please reply by March 12.


Ned






Replies:
Re: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS] Kay-Uwe Kasemir
Re: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS] Dale L. Brewe
References:
[Fwd: LabView/EPICS] Ned Arnold

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: EtherNet/IP for AB SLC5/05 PLC. Kay-Uwe Kasemir
Next: Re: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS] W T Meyer
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS] Ned Arnold
Next: Re: [Fwd: LabView/EPICS] Kay-Uwe Kasemir
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·