Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Brian Bevins <[email protected]> · Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:32:09 -0400

Marty Kraimer wrote:

An additional comments on Jeff's second suggestion:
Fix 2:

There is a new field called AVAL (for asynchronous value) which is
initialized at the start of processing to what

is in the VAL field. When processing completes the AVAL field is used to
determine if monitors will be sent instead

of VAL.
This does seem like it should be easy to implement.
General Rule: Record support that allows asynchronous processing must do
this for any field for which it checks for value change before issuing
monitors.
Marty Kraimer

Does this really solve the original problem? When asynchronous
processing starts for the second put won't it overwrite what the first
put cpoied into AVAL?
--
Brian S. Bevins, PE
Computer Scientist / Mechanical Engineer
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System