Jim Thomas wrote:
> It appears to me that I would want one IOSCANPVT for each input bit. That
> way only the records referencing that bit would get processed when that bit
> changes. If I have a hundred records looking at one bit on the card and
> one record looking at another bit that changes much more often, aren't
> those hundred records processed needlessly?
>
> Or does mbbi handling require a common IOSCANPVT ?
>
> Mahalo,
> Jim
If you provide mbbi device support then you almost have to provide one IOSCANPVT
for each digital I/O word rather than each bit. Only the mask fields in each
record instance determines which bits are used by that record.
Marty Kraimer
- References:
- IOSCANPVT Jim Thomas
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: IOSCANPVT Bob Dalesio
- Next:
EPICS base release R3.13.5 Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: IOSCANPVT Bob Dalesio
- Next:
EPICS base release R3.13.5 Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|