Ben,
I suspect that most of the effort required to interface EPICS R3.14 with HPUX
is going to be related to the implementation of threads on HPUX. My understanding
is that there is a very complete (better than Tornado II) implementation of the
C++ standard on HPUX.
Today, as in the past, it is a good idea to consolidate on a common
programming language. For OO system programming projects that require optimized
object code C++ is the industry standard. So for us, the issue is not to search
for the ultimate OO programming language syntax, but instead whether we should
continue to use only procedural programming techniques in C or move on to OO
techniques. Use of other languages beside C++ would not allow us to integrate
efficiently with our original C source code base.
Jeff
- Replies:
- Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: How to monitor 700 thermocouples? Steve Hunt
- Next:
MEDM display memory usage Robert Willson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|