EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Better version of dfanout record?
From: Marty Kraimer <[email protected]>
To: Mark Rivers <[email protected]>
Cc: "'Peregrine M. McGehee'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 08:53:32 -0500
My working copy of the dfanoutRecord has already been modified to make VAL a
double instead of a long. Peregrine's suggestion sounds like a good idea. I will
add the support. All future releases of base will have these changes, i.e.

1) VAL and all related fields (HOPR, LOPR, etc) will be DBF_DOUBLE instead of
DBF_LONG
2) dfanout will support the fields SELN, SELN, and SELL just like fanout.

Marty Kraimer

Mark Rivers wrote:
> 
> Peregrine wrote:
> 
> > I was just looking at the dfanout record and realized, to my
> > disappointment, that it does _not_ implement the SELM, SELN, and SELL
> > functionality present in the traditional fanout record.
> 
> I would like to point out another problem of the dfanout record.  The Record
> Reference Manual says that the VAL field is "double" but in fact it is
> "long".  I think the record would be much more useful if the field were in
> fact "double".  Would this break anything for anyone?  It seems that a
> double can exactly represent a "long" on all supported IOCs?  I have had to
> create a "ddfanout" record to have a "dfanout" but with a "double" VAL
> field.
> 
> Mark Rivers


Replies:
Re: Better version of dfanout record? Peregrine M. McGehee
References:
RE: Better version of dfanout record? Mark Rivers

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: Better version of dfanout record? Mark Rivers
Next: Re: Better version of dfanout record? Peregrine M. McGehee
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: Better version of dfanout record? Mark Rivers
Next: Re: Better version of dfanout record? Peregrine M. McGehee
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·