Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

> Since it looks as if we are going to replace the PID anyway, I have
> another proposal: an additional field for an error deadband. Whenever
> the (absolute value of the) error in the controlled variable is smaller
> than this deadband value, the PID record should assumes the error is
> zero. So differences below this value will never lead to a change of the
> correction value, even if KI is non-zero.

I think this is a good idea.  I will add it to the EPID record soon.

Mark Rivers

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Benjamin Franksen

Next: Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Brian Bevins

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: RE: Proposed R3.13.3 Steve Lewis

Next: Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Leonard J. Reder

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024