Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Steve Lewis <[email protected]> · Wed, 14 Jun 2000 08:39:14 -0700

As a future user, I think it should.  Bob Dalesio has been telling me
for years, use cpid, not the pid in base.  Recent tech-talk certainly
confirms that the old pid should be removed.

We did hear from Mark Rivers that he has one called epid.

Can anyone summarize the situation?

At 8:46 AM -0500 2000/06/14, Marty Kraimer wrote:
>Brian Bevins wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Marty,
> > 
> > What would you think of including the cpid record in base? It's already
> > described in the 3.13 Record Reference Manual.
> > 
> > --Brian Bevins
> >   Accelerator Controls Group
> >   Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
> > 
>
>
>I will let the pid users decide. I am not sure how many different versions of
>pid records exist. Is cpid a version most users agree will meet their needs?
>Unless there is a consensus it should not go into base.

_____________________________________________________________________
Stephen A. Lewis                        | [email protected]
Mail Stop 71-259                        | http://www.lbl.gov/~salewis
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory   | Tel: +1.510.486.7702
Berkeley, CA 94720    USA               | FAX: +1.510.486.4544

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System