Brian McAllister wrote:
>
> Marty Kraimer wrote:
>
> > What causes the confusion is that old database access, which is what CA uses,
> > only knows how to handle the maximum number of elements.
> >
> > The correct behavior is that cvt_dbaddr sets no_elements = NELM, ie the size of
> > the allocated array and get_array_info returns NORD, i.e. the current actual
> > number of elements.
>
> Does this explain why the value I sent no_elements to in get_array_info has
> no effect on the number of elements actually returned to a CA client ?
Yes. This will not be fixed until old database access goes away.
Marty
- References:
- CA and arrays Brian McAllister
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
CA and arrays Brian McAllister
- Next:
Re: Tcl/Tk and JAVA Channel Access Extention Lifang Zheng
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
CA and arrays Brian McAllister
- Next:
Build static libraries on WinNT Vladimir Sirotenko
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|