Marty Kraimer wrote:
> What causes the confusion is that old database access, which is what CA uses,
> only knows how to handle the maximum number of elements.
>
> The correct behavior is that cvt_dbaddr sets no_elements = NELM, ie the size of
> the allocated array and get_array_info returns NORD, i.e. the current actual
> number of elements.
Does this explain why the value I sent no_elements to in get_array_info has
no effect on the number of elements actually returned to a CA client ?
----
Brian McAllister Application Programmer/Beam Physicist
[email protected] MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator
(617) 253-9537 Middleton, MA
- Replies:
- Re: CA and arrays Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Extended talker/listener support in LanGPIB Version 2.4? Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: CA and arrays Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
aao-aai at JLAB for RF George Lahti
- Next:
Re: CA and arrays Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|