john sinclair wrote:
John,
You bring up an interesting issue, but... Our problem is not that the
heartbeats are dropped, but are just delayed. The heartbeat timestamps
generated by record processing are always exactly 0.5 second apart so we
are recieving all of them in sequence.
Peregrine
>
> .
> .
>
> This came to me right after sending the previous message.
>
> If channel access flow control is the problem, then a seqence number
> rather that a 0 to 1 toggle could fix things. The watchdog would get reset
> whenever the number changes.
>
> John Sinclair
> [email protected]
> Oak Ridge National Lab
> 865-576-6362 865-574-1268 (fax)
--
Peregrine M. McGehee Coordinator, Los Alamos Astrophysics
(505) 667-3273 MS H820, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545
- References:
- Re: Delays in receipt of CA monitors john sinclair
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: CA monitors...Update #2 Garrett D. Rinehart
- Next:
RE: Delays in receipt of CA monitors Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
<1999>
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Delays in receipt of CA monitors john sinclair
- Next:
RE: replacing the default CA exception handler Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
<1999>
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·