Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

[email protected] (Jeff Hill) · Thu, 8 Apr 1999 12:38:03 -0600

On Wednesday, April 07, 1999 2:39 PM, William Lupton [SMTP:[email protected]] wrote:
> looking for an existing entry point. On the Power PC, it doesn't find the
> first two but does find the last. I think (Jeff Hill might care to comment)
> that it would be fine simply not to search for the first two on the Power PC.
> 

Not searching for the first two on this board, or not printing the message,
would I suspect not prevent devLib.c from concluding on this architecture
that drivers are replacing an 
operational interrupt service routine when in fact a default (unsolicited)
interrupt service stub is being replaced. I dont care to imagine the
rationale for changing the name of the stubs on this particular board.

So we need to know the names of the unsolicited interrupt vector handlers for
this board, or we need to come up with an architecture neutral method to determine 
what the address of these subroutines is.

It _is_ odd that this problem was not seen on other PPC boards?

Jeff

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System