sergeynk wrote:
> I would like to try IndustryPack analog I/O modules using passive carriers.
> What is about IndustryPack perspectives?
> Is it reasonable to make new INDUSTRYPACK_IO type of link?
>
> I would prefer IndusryPack support without HiDEOS and use passive
> VME-bus carriers.
Have a look at my drvIpac software which handles the carrier issues and
is being used in an increasing number of IP module drivers. You can
find documentation on it at
http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~anj/epics/drvIpac.html
There is a new version which should be out soon, but it doesn't change
anything in the calling interface, I just added and reorganised the
carrier drivers slightly.
-- Andrew
___
.' `. Andrew Johnson, Head of Electronics
/ Royal ) Royal Greenwich Observatory
\ Greenwich Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EZ
| Observatory Tel: +44 1223 374823 Fax: 374700
+---------- WWW: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~anj
- References:
- IndustryPack perspectives sergeynk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
IndustryPack perspectives sergeynk
- Next:
Re: Proposal for boosted Symb device support Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
IndustryPack perspectives sergeynk
- Next:
CAMAC problems Garrett D. Rinehart
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|