William,
Thanks.
>
> Yes. The record with the CPP input link, and its downstream records, are
> in a different lock-set and behave like a mini CA client. I feel that
> CPP-driven records have the potential to replace many things that are
> currently done in sequencers.
I would have to agree.
And I'm also intrigued as to how we might have designed the Gemini command
completion system differently if this feature had existed 4 years ago.
Perhaps this is something I can take advantage of when implementing command
completion/subsystem synchronization on LEDA.
Aloha,
Peregrine
Peregrine M. McGehee Project Engineer: LEDA Control System
(505) 667-3273 [email protected]
LANSCE-8 Controls & Automation Los Alamos National Laboratory
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: synchronizing client requests & completions Peregrine M. McGehee
- Next:
Re: Proposal for boosted Symb device support Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: synchronizing client requests & completions Peregrine M. McGehee
- Next:
Re: synchronizing client requests & completions Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·