> 1) Provide a field RTYP in every record.
> 2) Provide a new Channel Access Request type.
>
> I agree with the second alternative.
How will device support (inside a routine called by records of different
types) be able to decide what type of record is calling it, then?
Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: proposed RTYP field Marty Kraimer
- References:
- Re: proposed RTYP field Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS r3.13 field VERS Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: proposed RTYP field Pete Jemian
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: proposed RTYP field Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: proposed RTYP field Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
<1998>
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|