Has anyone successfully used CALCULATION records with
capfast 3.02.23?
I found the following:
B=0?1:A was rejected with "missing question mark in conditional expression"
A%6 was rejected with "Illegal Operand"
B*(A+1) was rejected with "Illegal Operand"
In my opinion, this makes this version of Capfast unusable with CALC records.
Are these known bugs which have been fixed or are there **really**
syntax errors in the above expressions?
If they have been fixed, please can I get hold of a working version.
Andy
===================================================================================
Andy Foster
Royal Greenwich Observatory Tel: 44 (0)1223 374899 (direct)
Madingley Road Fax: 44 (0)1223 374700
Cambridge E-mail: [email protected]
CB3 0HA Home Page: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~ajf
UK
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
e2sr and the CALC record Andy Foster
- Next:
RE: e2sr and the CALC record Eric Bjorklund, NPSM
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: e2sr and the CALC record Eric Bjorklund, NPSM
- Next:
Re: Capfast 3.02.23 and CALC records Nick Rees
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·