Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

> From [email protected] Thu Oct 26 15:06 CDT 1995
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:06:33 MDT
> From: [email protected] (Rozelle Wright)
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived
> Cc: [email protected]
> Content-Type> : > text> 
> Content-Length: 1807
...

> I would like record processing code to provide the capability of archiving
> any field which is capable of being monitored.  
> This goes back to the original question which 
> started this thread of discussion. It was very confusing to see monitored
> values change on the operator screen when they did not change in the archived
> snapshots.
> In that example Marty's suggestion of the change to db_post in the
> section of code that posts monitors for the psub->a,psub->b...
> to
> db_post_events(psub,pnew,monitor_mask|DBE_VALUE|DBE_LOG) would do
> this for the current version of subroutine records.
> Rozelle Wright

Please note that the calc record has the same problem.
I have made this change to calc and sub in my development node so that it will
go into the next release (may be too late for 3.12.2).

Marty Kraimer

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Rozelle Wright

Next: CAN connection Gabor Csuka

Index: 1994  <1995>  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Rozelle Wright

Next: BURT modifications in progress winans

Index: 1994  <1995>  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024