Re; Marty's proposal:
> If we are going to have a new general purpose subroutine record then I would
> like to suggest one of the following.
[Two items deleted]
I have wanted a more general subroutine record. Let's find a time to
brainstorm over the 7-8 working days coming up in Chicago. Marty's
ideas seem like a good place to start.
Steve Lewis
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS status codes proposal Jim B. Kowalkowski
- Next:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|