|
Subject: |
Re: Anyone using fast ethernet in their IOCs? |
|
From: |
Mark Rivers <[email protected]> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 1995 20:21:33 -0500 (CDT) |
Peregrine writes:
> Of the responses I've gotten so far no one seems to be using or even actively
> looking at fast ethernet for transport of CCD images. The interfaces under
> consideration are ATM and HIPPI. The sites that have expressed interest have
> been either from the observatories or the APS CATS.
>
> HIPPI is under consideration by SBC CAT since there were difficulties in
> finding compatible ATM vendors that would allow communication between VME
> and any file server.
>
> ATM also seems to be preferred over FDDI due to being scalable from T1
> to 10Gbaud and having a guaranteed point-to-point bandwidth.
I should have noted in my previous post that SBC CAT is using HIPPI for the
interface from their VME CCD camera system to the NFS file server. The
workstations are connected to the NFS file server with ATM.
____________________________________________________________
Mark Rivers (312) 702-2279 (office)
CARS (312) 702-9951 (secretary)
Univ. of Chicago (312) 702-5454 (FAX)
5640 S. Ellis Ave. (708) 922-0499 (home)
Chicago, IL 60637 [email protected] (Internet)
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Anyone using fast ethernet in their IOCs? Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Re[2]: Portable CA Server Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Anyone using fast ethernet in their IOCs? Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Re[2]: Portable CA Server Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·