Subject: |
dvx 2502 |
From: |
[email protected] (Jeff Hill) |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 95 14:16:55 MST |
>
> Am I misssing something? It looks like it pads to a 64 byte boundary
> to me.
>
I see it now - it should be "int8_t end_pad[44]" not
"unsigned short end_pad[54]" if the DVX is 64 bytes in size.
I just assumed that they used characters for a pad.
Jeff
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: dvx 2502 Jeff Hill
- Next:
PV Names Begining with Numbers BJO
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: dvx 2502 Jeff Hill
- Next:
PV Names Begining with Numbers BJO
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|