Subject: |
Re: Release Numbers |
From: |
Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 1994 09:43:36 GMT |
On Thu, 24 Nov 1994 09:07:32 +0000 (GMT) Ian Smith wrote:
> If this scheme prevails ( I don't think a single letter will suffice )
> then our id would be ROE for Royal Observatory, Edinburgh.
In the light of Nick Rees' comments about interdependence between the astronomy
sites, and thinking specifically about the UK, would it not make more sense to
use RO = Royal Observatories? This would cover RGO, ROE, LPO and UKIRT/JCMT,
and given our likelyhood of developing stuff for each other I think we ought to
try and keep a common release.
- Andrew
,_}\_. Andrew Johnson, Technology Division
/ \ Royal Greenwich Observatory
~~~~~~~~| ,--/;. )~~~~ Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK
., |/ (/ U Phone: +44 (0)1223 374823
.`., /_\ . . Email: [email protected]
wwWWWww' WWW: http://cast0.ast.cam.ac.uk/~anj/
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Release Numbers Ian Smith
- Next:
Re: Release Numbers Ian Smith
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Release Numbers Ian Smith
- Next:
Re: Release Numbers Ian Smith
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|