Subject: |
Re: CALC Records |
From: |
[email protected] |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 94 09:36:33 -0600 |
>So to say that such changes could be implemented and the known effects minimized
>by a script that changes CALC expressions in CALC records is quite dangerous.
I don't recall anyone saying anything about conversion sripts and compatibility
in this thread... yet.
>The handy routines "postfix" and "calcPerform" have been used by other record
>types (at least two that I know of).
>...
>If the problem is that you don't like the way the CALC is specified, fix that
>with a different record type (e.g. "CCALC") and NEW routines.
If the old rutines MUST stay, I would vote for this too.
--John
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: CALC Records Ned Arnold
- Next:
CALC record Deb Kerstiens
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: CALC Records Ned Arnold
- Next:
CALC record Deb Kerstiens
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|