|
Subject: |
CAMAC |
|
From: |
[email protected] (Bob Dalesio) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 94 01:09:00 MST |
There are currently two schools of thought on the addressing of cAMAC.
One puts the configuration parameters into a proliferation of DTYPs
The other overloads the param field.
Is there a way to install the driver that either will work?
Should we standardizer on one or the other?
Should we be tolerant until version 4 comes along and fiexs this problem?
In the mean time which should be intsalled to demonstrate CAMAC.
Bob
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
More News About Duke Carl Dickey
- Next:
Re: CAMAC Marty Kraimer
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
More News About Duke Carl Dickey
- Next:
Re: CAMAC Marty Kraimer
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·