Subject: |
Re: request for status (2) |
From: |
[email protected] |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 1994 15:09:24 -0700 |
>
> I'm sorry but I forgot something...
>
> 5. Assuming (let's say) M68040-class IOCs, what is the fastest loop that one
> would normally close via database processing, ie via some sort of
>
> input record ---> algorithm record ---> output record
>
> chain? I just mean a ballpark figure. 1 Hz? 10 Hz? 20 Hz? Presumably one
> needs to consider two cases:
>
> a) all above database records on same IOC
> b) database records distributed across more than one IOC
>
> How much is the answer influenced by scan task priorities (assuming that
> CPU is not a scarce resource)?
Hmm, Sounds like you need to read the SSC's EPICS Performance Study that was
done with M68040s.
I have a postscript copy and can email you a uuencoded version if you wish.
Aloha,
Peregrine
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
request for status (2) William Lupton
- Next:
SSC Study mcgehee
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
request for status (2) William Lupton
- Next:
SSC Study mcgehee
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|