EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

<19941995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index <19941995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: CA WAN/gateway extensions notes
From: [email protected] (Tim Mooney)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 94 10:57:56 CDT
[email protected] writes:

> APS will ultimately have ~36 beam line sectors. Each sector will have an
> arbitrary number of workstations that can potentially want info from the APS
> accelerator control system. If we merely use gateways and access security then
> each beam line CA client will use resources in one or more of the controls
> IOCs. Since this is an unknown and potentially very large usage of ioc
> resources, especially memory, this could be a major problem.
>
> I can think of an easy out. For each sector there is an IOC for control of the beam
> line insertion device. This beam line IOC is managed by accelerator controls
> not by the beam line users. It seems natural to use this IOC as a concentrator.
> We (accelerator controls) could define records to link to all accelerator PVs
> needed by the users. A user connects to one of these records rather than to
> the actual IOC containing the PV to be monitored/controlled. No matter how
> many users connect to the beam line ioc, the number of channel access
> clients connected to the rest of the control network will not change. The
> worst thing the users could do is cause problems with their beam line ioc.
> With proper design this should only affect them and not the users of other
> beam lines.

To set a scale, let's assume each sector will have 10 workstations on
the experimental floor and 10 more in nearby offices.  I think this is
an overestimate, and certainly many of these workstations will not need
to look at accelerator-control information, although users are likely
to leave unneeded displays of accelerator information running.

Is it generally accepted that the problem mostly concerns IOC resources
and not controls-network bandwidth?  I've been assuming neither
controls IOCs nor the controls network are useable by beamline
scientists, and that the concentrator would be a fast workstation
running (more likely, pretending to run) an EPICS database.

Tim Mooney


Navigate by Date:
Prev: CA WAN/gateway extensions notes mrk
Next: Re: CA WAN/gateway extensions notes Steve Lewis
Index: <19941995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: CA WAN/gateway extensions notes mrk
Next: Re: CA WAN/gateway extensions notes Steve Lewis
Index: <19941995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·