> On 14 Dec 2017, at 15:50, Dirk Zimoch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> What I still do not understand is how to work on the EPICS 7 submodules.
>
>> On 14.12.2017 14:38, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
>> I avoid the redundant download with:
>>
>>> git clone --branch core/master https://github.com/epics-base/epics-base.git
>>> git submodule update --init --reference .
>>
>> Note that the second line ends with a dot '.'.
>
> After that, what is the state of the submodule? Latest commit? I found that git tells me that they are "not on any branch". Is that a problem?
>
> So when I want to propose a change for merge, what should I do?
> Create a new branch I suppose but in the submodule or in the main directory?
sunmodule
>
> Then pushing the merge request, will I push from the submodule or from the main directory?
>
sunmodule
> The whole work flow with submodules is still very unclear to me.
>
> Dirk
>
>>
>>
>>> On 12/14/2017 02:20 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> Hej,
>>> Yesterday I was sitting on a 3Mbit/sec line I was cloning base from Git,
>>> I realized that "base" needs to be transferred 4 times.
>>> I got 4 pack files, each 95M.
>>> One for base, modules/ca, modules/database, modules/libcom/
>>>
>>> 99 234 251 ./.git/modules/modules/ca/objects/pack/pack-08cf7dbc8f8108176628acb637cfa5d864f0aa43.pack
>>> 99234251 ./.git/modules/modules/database/objects/pack/pack-08cf7dbc8f8108176628acb637cfa5d864f0aa43.pack
>>> 99234251 ./.git/modules/modules/libcom/objects/pack/pack-08cf7dbc8f8108176628acb637cfa5d864f0aa43.pack
>>> 99234251 ./.git/objects/pack/pack-08cf7dbc8f8108176628acb637cfa5d864f0aa43.pack
>>>
>>> I think this is because the modularization was done without running
>>> "git filter-branch".
>>>
>>> My first question:
>>> Does anybody else feels that this is a problem to download
>>> 4*95 Mbyte, when 1*95 Mbyte enough ?
>>>
>>> And if yes, what should we do about it?
>>> a) Undo the modularization. Keep ca, database, libcom in the same
>>> Git as before ?
>>> b) Run Git filter-branch and try a surgery on the Gits?
>>> c) Leave everything as it is ?
>>>
>>> Any thoughts and opinions ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 01/12/17 01:20, Andrew Johnson wrote:
>>>> I just tagged, tarred, tested uploaded and pushed the -rc1, but I don't
>>>> have time to write the announcement email for tech-talk tonight. If no
>>>> one else feels like doing so I'll get to it tomorrow morning.
>>>>
>>>> - Andrew
>>>>
>>
- References:
- 7.0.1-rc1 Andrew Johnson
- Re: 7.0.1-rc1 Torsten Bögershausen
- Re: 7.0.1-rc1 Michael Davidsaver
- Re: 7.0.1-rc1 Dirk Zimoch
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
makeBaseApp example / QSRV Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: makeBaseApp example / QSRV Timo Korhonen
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: 7.0.1-rc1 Dirk Zimoch
- Next:
Re: 7.0.1-rc1 Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|