On 12/11/2017 04:58 AM, APS Jenkins wrote:
> See <https://jenkins.aps.anl.gov/job/epics-master/OS=mac/36/display/redirect?page=changes>
Hi Ralph,
Can you take a look and see if these might be caused by the test code
assuming that other threads will always get a chance to run within a
specific time, rather than waiting for them to signal that they have
completed their task.
Tests shouldn't fail on OSs that display different thread scheduling
characteristics when the CPU is overloaded. We have too many tests that
fail in that case already...
Thanks,
- Andrew
> simmTest.tap ..............
> not ok 547 - simval time < my time [TSE = 0]
> not ok 554 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2, no SIOL]
> not ok 559 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 563 - dbGetField("mbbiDirect.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> not ok 564 - time stamp taken from second pass processing
> not ok 594 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2]
> not ok 599 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 603 - dbGetField("mbboDirect.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> not ok 604 - time stamp taken from second pass processing
> not ok 649 - simval time < my time [TSE = 0]
> not ok 656 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2, no SIOL]
> not ok 661 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 665 - dbGetField("longin.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> not ok 666 - time stamp taken from second pass processing
> not ok 696 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2]
> not ok 701 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 705 - dbGetField("longout.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> not ok 706 - time stamp taken from second pass processing
> not ok 751 - simval time < my time [TSE = 0]
> not ok 758 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2, no SIOL]
> not ok 763 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 767 - dbGetField("int64in.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> not ok 768 - time stamp taken from second pass processing
> not ok 798 - new time stamp from IOC [TSE = -2]
> not ok 803 - time stamp is recent
> not ok 807 - dbGetField("int64out.PACT", 4) -> 0 == 1
> Failed 26/1176 subtests
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> simmTest.tap (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1176 Failed: 26)
> Failed tests: 547, 554, 559, 563-564, 594, 599, 603-604
> 649, 656, 661, 665-666, 696, 701, 705-706
> 751, 758, 763, 767-768, 798, 803, 807
> Files=11, Tests=3575, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.23 usr 0.02 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.27 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
--
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
- References:
- Jenkins build became unstable: epics-master » mac #36 APS Jenkins
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Appveyor-CI builds are back Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: Appveyor-CI builds are back Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Jenkins build became unstable: epics-master » mac #36 APS Jenkins
- Next:
Build failed in Jenkins: epics-master » mac #37 APS Jenkins
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|