Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
What is the use case?
Assume I have an AI record that reads from a PLC.
So I display that as a text update field on the UI.
Would you routinely display that record as a text entry field?
-Kay
Dear Core-talkers,
There is a possible request from our operations group to show VAL fields of input records as having no write access, if the device support would overwrite any value written at the next record processing.
Technically, these fields are writable.
Functionally, there are issues:
- The writing client (even using put-callback) will get the new value and show the operation as having succeeded.
- Other clients doing gets or creating new subscriptions (e.g. newly opened panels) will see the new value.
- Existing subscriptions (e.g. archivers, gateways, already open panels) will not get an update and have no clue.
- Depending on the situation (DTYP, SCAN) this inconsistent state may last a while.
What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks,
~Ralph
|
- Replies:
- Re: Possible Access Rights improvement? Ralph Lange
- References:
- Possible Access Rights improvement? Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Improved simulation mode prototype Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: Possible Access Rights improvement? Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Possible Access Rights improvement? Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: Possible Access Rights improvement? Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 21 Dec 2017 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|