| 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <2017> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <2017> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: CA server bind failure on Windows |
| From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
| To: | Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | EPICS core-talk <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:59:29 +0100 |
On 01/15/2017 12:01 PM, Ralph Lange wrote:
> NI's LabVIEW network variables server has a plugin that contains their
> implementation of the Channel Access server,
> see http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13865/en/ . While their CA server has a
> couple of flaws and issues and doesn't fully behave like the EPICS CA
> servers (e.g. by presumably using SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE), using the
> Channel Access ports for Channel Access is definitely legitimate and
> recommended.
Is this a vote to accept Freddie's change then? It makes sense to me,
but I don't claim to be a networking expert.