Hi Ralph,
On 01/15/2017 12:01 PM, Ralph Lange wrote:
> NI's LabVIEW network variables server has a plugin that contains their
> implementation of the Channel Access server,
> see http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13865/en/. While their CA server has a
> couple of flaws and issues and doesn't fully behave like the EPICS CA
> servers (e.g. by presumably using SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE), using the
> Channel Access ports for Channel Access is definitely legitimate and
> recommended.
Is this a vote to accept Freddie's change then? It makes sense to me,
but I don't claim to be a networking expert.
- Andrew
--
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
- Replies:
- Re: CA server bind failure on Windows Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: dllPath.bat problem Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: CA server bind failure on Windows Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: dllPath.bat problem Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: CA server bind failure on Windows Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|