EPICS Home

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System


 
2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <20172018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <20172018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: dllPath.bat problem
From: Mark Rivers <[email protected]>
To: EPICS Core Talk <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:14:07 +0000

Folks,

 

The EPICS build system can construct a dllPath.bat file in an ioc boot directory.  This is very convenient when running IOCs built dynamically for Windows.  An example of such a file is the one built in asyn/iocBoot/iocTest.

 

corvette:asyn/iocBoot/ioctest>more dllPath.bat

@ECHO OFF

PATH %PATH%;/home/epics/support/asyn-4-31/bin/linux-x86_64;/corvette/home/epics/support/seq-2-2-4/bin/linux-x86_64;/corvette/usr/local/epics/base-3.15.5/bin/linux-x86_64

 

However, I think there is an issue with these files.  Note that it puts the current PATH at the beginning of the new path, rather than at the end.  This means that if the current path contains a DLL with the same name as a DLL created by EPICS, it will use the one in the current path, not the one that EPICS created.  It seems to me that this is the wrong thing to do, for several reasons:

 

-          What if the current path happens to contain, for example, a DLL called “com.dll” or “ca.dll” which is completely unrelated to EPICS.  It will use the wrong DLL.

-          What if the current path contains an older version of one of the DLLs that EPICS built.  This is what just happened to me.  I have the Anaconda Python bin/ directory in my path, and it contains hdf5.dll.  It is an older version of the HDF5 library.  EPICS areaDetector builds hdf5.dll using the latest code, actually patched beyond anything the HDF5 group had yet released.  My IOC won’t run, because the old DLL does not contain the symbols added recently.

 

Are there any circumstances under which the current behavior would be desired?

 

Thanks,

Mark

 


Replies:
Re: dllPath.bat problem Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Concerns about link-support-2 branch Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: dllPath.bat problem Andrew Johnson
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <20172018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Concerns about link-support-2 branch Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: dllPath.bat problem Andrew Johnson
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  <20172018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024