On 04/26/2016 12:40 PM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> The main point of this is to allow IOC databases to calculate time
> differences between events or measure frequencies etc. The EPOCH doesn't
> matter as long as the units are seconds. I guess we could add the
> ability to choose the EPOCH if someone needs that; the INP field is
> currently ignored.
I've used this dset as well, again only for relative measurements.
I'm not sure this needs at a change, or option, at this point. Could
just as easily add 631152000 with a calc record.
- References:
- Feature [?] of Soft Timestamp support Ralph Lange
- Re: Feature [?] of Soft Timestamp support Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Feature [?] of Soft Timestamp support Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.15-win32-test #44 APS Jenkins
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Feature [?] of Soft Timestamp support Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.15-win32-test #44 APS Jenkins
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|