Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

FYI I have been able to reproduce this a couple of times.

On 03/04/2016 12:13 PM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 11:56 AM, APS Jenkins wrote:
>> src/ioc/db/test/O.linux-x86/dbCaLinkTest.tap ............. 
>> not ok 14 -  == hello
>> Failed 1/99 subtests 
> To put this in context.  This is effectively failing in the same place
> as previously.  The same test is repeated with native and string CA links.
>
>> src/ioc/db/test/O.linux-x86/dbCaLinkTest.tap ............. 
>> not ok  7 - temp (0) == 42 (42)
>> Failed 1/99 subtests 
> Zero and empty string are the previous values of the link, so my attempt
> to wait for for an update is probably racy.
>

Replies:

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 Michael Davidsaver

References:

Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #29 APS Jenkins

Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 APS Jenkins

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 Michael Davidsaver

Navigate by Date:

Prev: RE: EPICS Base 3.16.0.1 released Williams Jr., Ernest L.

Next: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 Michael Davidsaver

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <2016>  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 Michael Davidsaver

Next: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-linux32-test #30 Michael Davidsaver

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <2016>  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024