Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

On 07/06/2015 02:23 PM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
> FYI, it seems that as of gcc 4.8 there is a new warning which is
> triggered by STATIC_ASSERT in Base.
> 
> This warning means that the assertion is *not* being violated.

I see that in 3.15 we already include the EPICS_UNUSED attribute in that
macro, does it help to move it immediately after the 'int'?

- Andrew

-- 
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong.
No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has
always got there first, and is waiting for it.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man

Replies:

Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.

References:

STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver

Navigate by Date:

Prev: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver

Next: Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <2015>  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver

Next: Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <2015>  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024