One thought...
I can easily imagine situations, e.g with cameras or acquisition cards,
where a low-level driver (maybe shipped as binary) provides a new
pointer to an array with every callback. I would really like an array
record to be able to use this driver-allocated buffer, without copying,
hopefully up to the network layer.
Restricting the out-of-bounds-offset hack to one allocated chunk of
memory would not serve this case, would it?
~Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: double buffered waveformRecord Michael Davidsaver
- References:
- double buffered waveformRecord Michael Davidsaver
- Re: double buffered waveformRecord Andrew Johnson
- Re: double buffered waveformRecord Michael Davidsaver
- Re: double buffered waveformRecord Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: double buffered waveformRecord Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: double buffered waveformRecord Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: double buffered waveformRecord Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: double buffered waveformRecord Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|