Hi Ernest,
On 2012-05-15 Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:
> Here at SLAC we are working with a new RTOS (soft real-time)
> As the development continues forward, I hope it approaches hard-real time.
RTLinux is a commercial product from Wind River, is that what you're using?
If not you should pick a different target name. I'm aware that there is an
Open RTLinux license available for academic, research and free software
projects, but that's using the same code as the commercial product.
> We are proposing the following name in <BASE>/configure/os
> CONFIG.Common.rtlinux-x86
> CONFIG_SITE.Common.rtlinux-x86
>
> The above is support Intel-based targets.
>
> Another target we have is a freescale P2020
> CONFIG.Common.rtlinux-ppcP2020
> CONFIG_SITE.Common.rtlinux-ppcP2020
Will these targets be using the standard Linux OS_CLASS or do they require
their own versions of the OS-dependent files under src/libCom/osi/os?
- Andrew
--
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
- Replies:
- Re: New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- References:
- New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Next:
Re: New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Next:
Re: New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch Ernest L. Williams Jr.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|