Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

On 08/05/2011 08:21 PM, Jeff Hill wrote:
> ...I also made 586 (pentium circa 1995) the minimum architecture by default for mingw and linux so that we can have an efficient implementation.
>   

So this changes the linux-x86 target to be (effectively) an alias for
linux-586?  Currently it is using whatever the toolchain default is.  I
assume the reason for changing linux-x86 is that most users pick that
instead of eg. linux-586?  I'm not arguing against this, I just trying
to understand what effects this change will have.

FYI. Debian linux still builds a (by default) i486 toolchain.  However,
Ubuntu and Fedora have 686 toolchains.

http://distrowatch.com/

Michael


-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics/+merge/70642
Your team EPICS Core Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base.

Replies:

Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base mdavidsaver

References:

[Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base Jeff Hill

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: c++ static initialization Eric Norum

Next: Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base mdavidsaver

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base Michael Davidsaver

Next: Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/epicsR3.15-atomics into lp:epics-base mdavidsaver

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024