> Oops. I have not looked close enough. The C and C++ interfaces differ in
> the return value. The C++ methods really return bool, whereas the C
> routines return the epicsEventWaitStatus. Am I the only one who finds
> this confusing?
It hasn’t been an issue for me
> What happens if the C++ method encounters an error?
It throw an exception. It is very typical for C++, and
Java, interfaces to throw an exception when there is an
error
Jeff
______________________________________________________
Jeffrey O. Hill Email [email protected]
LANL MS H820 Voice 505 665 1831
Los Alamos NM 87545 USA FAX 505 665 5107
Message content: TSPA
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is
not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they
are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them
as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Ben Franksen
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 7:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: epicsEvent semantics
>
> On Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, Ben Franksen wrote:
> > On Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 October 2010 14:15:54 Ralph Lange wrote:
> > > > On 29.10.2010 15:10, Eric Norum wrote:
> > > > > +dded to epicsEventTest and the application developers guide
> > > > > has been updated +to describe this requirement.</p>
> > > >
> > > > Did you actually update the guide? At least I don't see it on
> > > > launchpad yet...
> > >
> > > Working on it, I have some uncommitted formatting changes that I
> > > want to keep separate that I'm also dealing with.
> >
> > While you're at it, please fix the description for wait and tryWait,
> > they are most probably wrong. What is returned is an
> > epicsEventWaitStatus, not boolean. When interpreted as boolean the
> > return value is zero (false) if the event *did* happen
> > (epicsEventWaitOK) and non-zero (true) if it did not happen
> > (epicsEventWaitTimeout) or if an error happened
> > (epicsEventWaitError). At least this is what the names suggest.
>
> Oops. I have not looked close enough. The C and C++ interfaces differ in
> the return value. The C++ methods really return bool, whereas the C
> routines return the epicsEventWaitStatus. Am I the only one who finds
> this confusing? What happens if the C++ method encounters an error?
>
> Cheers
> ben
- References:
- epicsEvent semantics Eric Norum
- Re: epicsEvent semantics Andrew Johnson
- Re: epicsEvent semantics Ben Franksen
- Re: epicsEvent semantics Ben Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: epicsEvent semantics Andrew Johnson
- Next:
StandardString should be a template? Jeff Hill
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: epicsEvent semantics Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: epicsEvent semantics J. Lewis Muir
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|