The final patch, I hope:
=== modified file 'documentation/RELEASE_NOTES.html'
--- documentation/RELEASE_NOTES.html 2010-10-26 15:49:26 +0000
+++ documentation/RELEASE_NOTES.html 2010-10-29 19:08:56 +0000
@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
<h2 align="center">Changes between 3.14.11 and 3.14.12</h2>
<!-- Insert new items immediately below here ... -->
+<h4>epicsEvent</h4>
+
+<p>epicsEvents are now explicitly required to act as simple binary semaphores.
+A single epicsEventSignal call must awaken just one thread when multiple
+threads are waiting for an event. A test thats checks for this has been
+dded to epicsEventTest and the application developers guide has been updated
+to describe this requirement.</p>
+
<h4>Added windows-x64 target</h4>
<p>64-bit binaries for Microsoft Windows platforms can now be built using the
--
Eric Norum
[email protected]
- Replies:
- Re: epicsEvent semantics Ralph Lange
- Re: epicsEvent semantics J. Lewis Muir
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: RTEMS tests -- epicsThreadOnce broken? Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: epicsEvent semantics Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: RTEMS tests -- epicsThreadOnce broken? Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: epicsEvent semantics Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|