On 28.10.2010 18:59, Ben Franksen wrote:
[...]
Regarding the choice of which task will get the semahore if more than
one is waiting, I will for now assume that this is (intentionally) left
unspecified. This means I will have to implement FIFO order on top of
epicsEvent. The only other solution would be to extend the interface
with another constructor and then implement FIFO order *inside*
epicsEvent for those systems that do not support that natively (which
is what you wrote above, so maybe you *did* get the point I was trying
to make and I didn't get yours. Whatever ;-).
My current idea is to wait for your FIFO implementation and then see if
that can be moved into epicsEvent... ;-)
Ralph
- References:
- Re: epicsEvent Ralph Lange
- Re: epicsEvent Ben Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RTEMS tests -- epicsThreadOnce broken? Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: RTEMS tests -- epicsThreadOnce broken? Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: epicsEvent Ben Franksen
- Next:
Re: epicsEvent Eric Norum
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|