> More observations from Steven:
>
> Now, I just rebuilt all of base on linux with HOST_OPT=NO. Even stranger.
> Using optimized build on linux, caget failed with an unexpected read
> access error 19 out of 20 times just tested. Using non-optimized build
> on linux, caget failed 2 out of 20 times!
This appears to be a major hint. I need to confirm that the behavior changed
this way (as described above) when the CA client library's optimization
level changes, and that during this experiment the IOC's optimization level
was not changed.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Ralph Lange
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:46 AM
To: EPICS Tech Talk
Subject: Re: Possible Bug in 3.14.9 Access Security on mv2100
More observations from me:
I can also see the faulty behaviour against a Linux 3.14.9 IOC.
Including the statistical behaviour that Steven was reporting. Some of
the caget calls get the unexpected "no read", others don't. On the same
Linux host, caget fails about 20%. Cross to vxWorks mv2100 IOC, caget
fails 100%. Camonitor works all the time, against all type IOCs.
Rebuilding Base 3.14.9 with the as subdirectory from 3.14.8.2 does not
change the faulty behaviour at all. The as parser cleanup things got away.
More observations from Steven:
I already have optimization turned off for the cross compiler (have been
bit by that on VxWorks before) but have host optimization on. I tried
turning off host optimization and recompiling caget on linux, but the
problem remained.
Now, I just rebuilt all of base on linux with HOST_OPT=NO. Even stranger.
Using optimized build on linux, caget failed with an unexpected read
access error 19 out of 20 times just tested. Using non-optimized build
on linux, caget failed 2 out of 20 times!
Houston, we have a problem.
Ralph
- Replies:
- RE: Possible Bug in 3.14.9 Access Security on mv2100 Steven Hartman
- Re: Possible Bug in 3.14.9 Access Security on mv2100 Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Pre-Release Tests of EPICS Base Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: Possible Bug in 3.14.9 Access Security on mv2100 Steven Hartman
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Pre-Release Tests of EPICS Base Jeff Hill
- Next:
RE: Possible Bug in 3.14.9 Access Security on mv2100 Steven Hartman
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|