> I am also still in the process of running the mrkSoftTest suite.
Thanks for running Marty's tests again. I discovered some issues when I
improved the guard class to detect a certain class of problems. From my
perspective, the problems looked like they exposed vulnerabilities of
sufficient magnitude to justify some reorganization of the source code that
was required to fix them.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:18 AM
> To: EPICS core-talk
> Subject: R3.14.9: Any changes still pending?
>
> Does anyone have any changes for R3.14.9 that they haven't committed
> yet? I would like to tag the -RC1 release tomorrow, but my rules imply
> that there's no point doing that if someone has any patches to commit.
>
> I have a minor IOC shutdown issue on Linux that I should have pushed
> harder with earlier, but the solution would affect many source files and
> we don't have time to discuss the fix now so I'll document it on the
> Known Problems page and leave the resolution until later.
>
> I am also still in the process of running the mrkSoftTest suite.
>
> Jeff - are all your fixes committed now? I don't want to go ahead with
> the -RC1 tag until I get a positive response from you.
>
> - Andrew
> --
> The right to be heard does not automatically include
> the right to be taken seriously. -- Hubert H. Humphrey
- References:
- R3.14.9: Any changes still pending? Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: R3.14.9: Any changes still pending? Jeff Hill
- Next:
FW: R3.14.9: Any changes still pending? Jeff Hill
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: R3.14.9: Any changes still pending? Jeff Hill
- Next:
FW: R3.14.9: Any changes still pending? Jeff Hill
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|